Darmowe konto pozwoli wrócić do niego później.
Polecenie
You are going to hear an interview about cryptozoology. Complete each sentence
(3.1.–3.5.) with a word or phrase, according to what you have heard. You will hear
the recording twice.
Transkrypcja nagrania:
Interviewer: My guest tonight is Loren Coleman, a pioneer of cryptozoology. Loren, was
there a specific event that triggered your interest in the subject?
Loren: When I was about thirteen, I saw a Japanese movie Half Human. It was about
Darmowe konto pozwoli wrócić do niego później.
the Abominable Snowman, better known as the Yeti. I got fascinated with it and
wanted to know more about such creatures but the adults around me did not take
my questions seriously. When I asked my teachers what this business about
the Yeti was, I was given three blunt answers: "They don't exist," "Get back to
your studies," and "Don't bother me with that." Not much of an encouragement.
Interviewer: I guess our listeners are curious to know what cryptozoology is about.
Loren: Well, cryptozoology is the study of animals and other creatures that have not yet
been accepted by science as real. Such animals are known as cryptids.
Cryptozoologists try to prove that they might exist. Although cryptozoology
doesn't enjoy as much respect as other scientific disciplines, it has had some
spectacular success stories. There are numerous examples of animals which were
considered mythical and then turned out to be real, for instance mountain gorillas
or okapi. Most of the time, cryptozoologists do not work in the field.
The likelihood of encountering the animals we pursue is so small that it wouldn't
make sense to organize expeditions. It is much easier for us to collect sightings
from witnesses who came across a cryptid by accident. Since most cryptids
belong in the realms of myths or fantasy, our main job is not to prove that
a certain cryptid exists, but rather to collect evidence to keep the question open.
If there is a chance it might exist, we can attract zoologists' attention and this in
turn brings the kind of research funding necessary to discover a new species.
Interviewer: What do you think attracts people to cryptids?
Loren: The Yeti, Bigfoot and Nessie, are what I call "celebrity cryptids." Why are
people drawn to these creatures? For one thing, most of us like mysteries. And
also, as humans, we take a keen interest in animals that exhibit a close likeness
to us, especially mammals that are human-sized and bigger.
Interviewer: There is also a lot of media interest in such creatures.
Loren: That's true, the problem is that the media mainly talk about cryptids as monsters,
fuelling stereotypes that are hard to overcome. Myths and rumours of Bigfoot,
Nessie or the Yeti are usually covered as sensational topics and as a result
reporters and journalists tend to imply that cryptozoologists are all hoaxers.
Interviewer: Cryptozoology is often described as a pseudoscience. What do you say to
that?
Loren: It's true that the field is still frowned upon by the scientific community, as for
the majority of scientists cryptozoology fails to adhere to scientific methods and
standards of empirical research. However, advocates of the discipline assert that
cryptozoology should be recognized as a legitimate science and classified as
a subfield of zoology. For me, it spans zoology, popular culture, folklore,
ethnography, anthropology, and many other sciences and deserves to be taken
seriously.
Interviewer: Thank you for being here with us today.
3.1. When Loren Coleman was a teenager, his teachers _______________________________ his interest in the Yeti.
3.2. Cryptozoologists' work involves collecting ____________________________________ ___________________________________.
3.3. The public at large is most interested in mysterious creatures which __________________ _____________________________________________________.
3.4. Loren criticizes mass media for ______________________________________________.
3.5. Loren points out that many scientists do not recognize cryptozoology as science because _______________________________________________________________________.
3.1. did not approve of / discouraged / did not care about / did not take seriously / did not share / ignored / did not like
3.2. eye-witnesses' accounts / reports / sightings; evidence to show a creature might exist; evidence to keep some questions open; proves for the existence of cryptids; sightings from/of witnesses; evidence from people; witnesses
3.3. are similar to humans / resemble humans / are human size (or bigger); show likeness to us; which are alike; which are a mystery; look like monsters; which are familiar to ourselves; which are popular / famous like Nessie
3.4. distorting the image of cryptozoology/cryptozoologists / presenting false image of cryptozoology/cryptozoologists / fuelling stereotypes / spreading stereotypical information about cryptozoology / its portrayal of cryptozoologists / paying too much attention to sensational topics / being stereotypical / stereotypes / talking about cryptids as monsters / calling these creatures monsters / implying that some of those creatures didn't exist / treating scientists like hoaxes
3.5. it does not comply with the standards / it does not meet the standards (of empirical research) / it does not follow/use scientific methods / it fails compared to other sciences / it lacks scientific methods / they don't take seriously looking for mysterious creatures
prawidłowa odpowiedź.
Wymagane są odpowiedzi na pytania zgodne z treścią wysłuchanego tekstu. Akceptowane są również inne odpowiedzi, jeżeli są merytorycznie poprawne i spełniają wszystkie warunki zadania. Błędy ortograficzne i gramatyczne niezakłócające komunikacji nie wpływają na ocenę odpowiedzi zdającego.
Ocena według schematu punktowania CKE, zwykle w 15–30 s
Dowiedz się, ile punktów naprawdę zdobywasz. Zrób zdjęcie kartki albo wklej odpowiedź: Maturownik+ porówna ją ze schematem punktowania, policzy punkty i wytłumaczy, gdzie i dlaczego je tracisz.