Zadanie 2b

3 pktobliczenioweśrednie (szac.)Paper 3, maj 2024, TZ2

Wzorowane na: Chemistry HL Paper 3, May 2024, TZ2, pytanie 2(b). Treść, dane i kontekst są zmienione; sprawdzane umiejętności, format i punktacja jak w oryginale.

Darmowe konto pozwoli wrócić do niego później.

Informacja do zadań 2a-2b.

Green chemistry aims to design chemical processes that produce less waste, use less energy and avoid hazardous substances. Four metrics used to judge how green a process is are defined in the table.

MetricDefinition
Process mass intensity (PMI)total mass of all materials used in the process (reactants, solvents, water, reagents and process aids) divided by the mass of the desired product
E-factormass of all waste, including used solvents, divided by the mass of the desired product
Atom economymass of the desired product divided by the total mass of the reactants in the balanced equation
Eco-Scale100 minus the sum of the penalty points given for low yield, hazardous chemicals, unconventional equipment and prolonged heating

Polecenie

Two methods of making ethyl ethanoate are compared using the Eco-Scale. The penalty points are given in the table.

ParameterPenalty points
N (dangerous for the environment)5
T (toxic)5
F (highly flammable)5
F+ (extremely flammable)10
Yield100−yield (%)2\dfrac{100 - \mathrm{yield\ (\%)}}{2}
Unconventional activation, for example microwave heating2
Inert gas atmosphere1
Heating for less than 1 hour2
Heating for more than 1 hour3

Method 1: ethanoic acid reacts with ethanol, with concentrated sulfuric acid as the catalyst. The mixture is heated in a microwave reactor for 40 minutes and the yield is 68 %. The hazard codes of the reagents are ethanoic acid (F) and ethanol (F).

Method 2: ethanoyl chloride reacts with ethanol in the presence of pyridine, under a dry nitrogen atmosphere, at room temperature for 30 minutes. The yield is 88 %. The hazard codes of the reagents are ethanoyl chloride (F, T), ethanol (F) and pyridine (F, T).

(i) Determine the Eco-Scale value for Method 1, ignoring the sulfuric acid catalyst.

(ii) Suggest one reason why Method 2 has a lower Eco-Scale value than Method 1.

Sprawdź rozwiązanieUkryj rozwiązanieKlucz i punktacja

Zanim porównasz z kluczem

Jak poszło Ci z tym zadaniem?

Wybierz ocenę: zapisze wynik i od razu oznaczy zadanie jako zrobione.

Zapis wymaga darmowego konta. Załóż konto

Odpowiedź z klucza

(i) total penalty points «= 5 + 5 + 100−682\dfrac{100-68}{2} + 2 + 2 = 10 + 16 + 2 + 2 =» 30 ✔

Eco-Scale «= 100 − 30 =» 70 ✔

(ii) any one of:

more of the reagents earn penalty points «ethanoyl chloride and pyridine are both flammable and toxic» ✔

OR

the penalty points for the reagents are greater «25 compared with 10» ✔

OR

it needs an inert nitrogen atmosphere, which Method 1 does not ✔

OR

it uses more toxic reagents ✔

Schemat punktowania

(i) M1: the penalty points added up, including the halved yield penalty. M2: subtraction from 100. ECF from M1. Award [1 max] if one penalty is omitted or if the yield penalty is not halved. (ii) [1]: any one reason; apply the list principle. A lower yield is not accepted, because Method 2 has the higher yield.

Komentarz

Method 2 scores 68: penalty points 25 for the reagents, 6 for yield and 1 for the inert atmosphere.

Umiejętności w zadaniu