Zadanie 9, Paper 2, specimen 2025, Biologia IB HL
Wzorowane na: Biology HL Paper 2, Specimen 2025, pytanie 9. Treść, dane i kontekst są zmienione; sprawdzane umiejętności, format i punktacja jak w oryginale.
Darmowe konto pozwoli wrócić do niego później.
Zadanie
Polecenie
Some environmental contaminants interfere with biological processes.
(a) Describe how a persistent fat-soluble pesticide can become concentrated in predatory birds.
(b) Compare and contrast competitive and non-competitive inhibition of enzymes.
(c) Outline effects on cellular respiration of a toxin that strongly blocks mitochondrial electron transport.
One additional mark is available for clear, concise construction of the complete response.
Korepetytor AI
Nie wiesz, jak ruszyć? Korepetytor zna to zadanie i poprowadzi Cię krok po kroku, bez gotowca.
3 rozmowy · bez karty · Zaloguj się
Sprawdź się
Odpowiedz i oceń, jak poszło. Klucz odsłoń dopiero, gdy masz swoją odpowiedź.
Jak poszło Ci z tym zadaniem?
Wybierz ocenę: zapamięta ją ta przeglądarka, a z darmowym kontem zobaczysz ją na każdym urządzeniu.
Pokaż rozwiązanieUkryj rozwiązanieKlucz i punktacja
Odpowiedź z klucza
(a) Maximum 4:
The chemical persists because it degrades slowly. ✔
It enters food chains at producers or other low trophic levels. ✔
Feeding transfers the chemical to higher trophic levels. ✔
Excretion may be difficult or slow. ✔
It accumulates in fatty tissues. ✔
Higher trophic levels can have higher concentrations. ✔
Bioaccumulation within organisms OR biomagnification along food chains occurs. ✔
(b) Maximum 7:
Both types reduce enzyme-catalysed reaction rates. ✔
Both involve interactions with the enzyme, including amino-acid side chains. ✔
Competitive inhibitors bind at the active site whereas non-competitive inhibitors bind elsewhere. ✔
Competitive inhibitors do not bind at the allosteric site, whereas non-competitive inhibitors bind at an allosteric site. ✔
Competitive binding blocks substrate access, whereas non-competitive binding changes enzyme function through a separate site. ✔
Competitive inhibitors often resemble the substrate, whereas such resemblance is not required for non-competitive inhibition. ✔
Increasing substrate concentration can overcome reversible competitive inhibition but does not restore the uninhibited maximum rate in pure non-competitive inhibition. ✔
Both types can be reversible; non-competitive inhibition is not necessarily permanent. ✔
A valid competitive example is malonate inhibiting succinate dehydrogenase; an appropriate allosteric example is isoleucine feedback inhibition of threonine deaminase. ✔
(c) Maximum 4:
Aerobic respiration slows. ✔
Reduced NAD accumulates when its oxidation is inhibited. ✔
Electron transfer through the affected pathway declines. ✔
Less energy is available to pump protons across the inner membrane. ✔
The proton gradient diminishes. ✔
Proton flow through ATP synthase decreases. ✔
Oxidative ATP production falls. ✔
Oxygen accepts fewer or no electrons OR less or no water is formed. ✔
Construction: 1 mark for clear, concise communication across the response.
Schemat punktowania
Award any N listed points within each part, where N is its cap. Part caps: 4, 7, 4. Maximum 15 content marks plus 1 independent construction mark, total 16. In (b), at least one similarity is required for 7 marks. Accept accurate examples without requiring a particular named inhibitor. Do not credit the false universal statement that non-competitive inhibition is permanent. In (c), glycolytic ATP production may continue and the effect depends on the inhibited site.
Umiejętności w zadaniu
- Electron flow driving proton pumpingĆwicz podobne
- Competition for enzyme active sitesĆwicz podobne
- Increasing pollutant concentrations along food chainsĆwicz podobne
- Mitochondrial ATP production by chemiosmosisĆwicz podobne
- Oxygen accepting electrons at the respiratory chainĆwicz podobne
- Allosteric inhibition of enzyme activityĆwicz podobne
- Reduced NAD feeding mitochondrial electron transportĆwicz podobne